• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»PEA in the mining/extractives sector

PEA in the mining/extractives sector

Helpdesk Report
  • Claire Mcloughlin
November 2013

Question

What is the relevance of political economy analysis (PEA) to mining/extractives interventions? How and why has political economy analysis (PEA) been applied in this sector? What tools or guidance are available for conducting PEA in this sector?

Summary

Political economy analysis (PEA) is a form of analysis concerned with understanding the prevailing political and economic processes governing behavior in society – specifically, how these processes affect the incentives of different actors, and the distribution and contestation of power between them. It is intended to support more effective and politically feasible development interventions by setting realistic expectations of what can be achieved, over what timescale, and the risks involved. There are, however, ongoing debates about how to realise this potential of PEA to improve development programming.

The limited available literature suggests that the particular relevance of PEA to mining is that is can help development agencies to understand:

  • The (potential) impacts of mining on development: specifically, to understand the obstacles to allocating resource rents for developmental purposes.
  • Relationships between actors: including between different levels of the state.
  • Elite incentives and the potential for ‘resource curse’: in particular, understanding elite incentives to generate rents, and the complex range of factors that affect their capacity to do so.
  • Rent distribution: understanding why and how elites use rents to re-enforce their power, and why they select certain public policies.
  • The feasibility of reform: much of the literature emphasises the role of PEA in highlighting ‘best fit’ (as opposed to best practice) solutions.

A variety of case-study examples are included in this report which further highlight the range of practical purposes for which PEA has been commissioned in the mining sector, how it has been undertaken in practice (i.e. methodologies), and its subsequent implications for programming.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • Australian Government

Related Content

Regional cooperation and political stability and prosperity
Donor funded alliances promoting regional cooperation
Helpdesk Report
2017
Factors affecting success or failure of political transitions
Helpdesk Report
2017
National climate change governance
Topic Guide
2017
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more