GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»PRSP Monitoring and Accountability in Fragile States

PRSP Monitoring and Accountability in Fragile States

Helpdesk Report
  • Seema Khan
March 2008

Question

Please provide a review of the literature on monitoring and accountability mechanisms for PRSPs in post-conflict or fragile states. This should include examples as well as more general materials on best practice.

Summary

The focus of this query is institutional arrangements for Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS) process monitoring. Most of the literature found for this query emphasises that instead of concentrating all activities in a single body, a wide set of actors should be involved, each having their own role. Within the government, for example, the central ministries of finance and planning may be responsible for designing the monitoring and evaluation strategy, monitoring its implementation, using the results, and providing data on expenditures; the sectoral ministries will usually provide data on outputs; the central statistical agency will be responsible for collecting of data from households and individuals and external research centres, universities, and NGOs, will often also collect and analyse information. It is generally agreed that, from the outset, a clear and coherent framework for this institutional arrangement should be developed. In addition, a well-resourced and well-placed unit, which can take ultimate responsibility for the work, is necessary for any monitoring system to be effective.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Related Content

Doing research in fragile contexts
Literature Review
2019
Social Safety Nets in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States
Helpdesk Report
2019
Approaches to remote monitoring in fragile states
Helpdesk Report
2017
Organised crime, violence and development
Topic Guide
2016

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".