• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»GSDRC Publications»Regional development programmes and poverty reduction

Regional development programmes and poverty reduction

Helpdesk Report
  • Emilie Combaz
November 2013

Question

What evidence is there of the performance or impact of regional development programmes in reducing poverty at the national level? What aid delivery channels have been most effective in this regard?

Summary

This report looks into the actual performance, and possibly impact, of regional development programmes on national-level poverty reduction and associated factors such as ‘good governance’.

The evidence base presents some strengths, such as the availability of diverse and rigorous evaluations, but also significant difficulties, most notably the lack of clear data on impact, the weak connection to poverty reduction, and the frequent lack of group-specific information (e.g. on gender). Crucially, effects on poverty cannot be attributed to regional programmes only, due to the large complex of variables that shape impact.

Nevertheless, the literature offers the following points:

  • Regional development programmes have generally yielded performance and impact that are average – on par with national programmes – and highly variable from one programme to another, in terms of relevance, effectiveness, sustainability and efficiency.
  • Identified obstacles to successful performance and impact have included:
    – Diverging incentives and interests.
    – A lack of national ownership and consultation.
    – A lack of coordination and gaps in national-regional connections.
    – Sectoral segmentation.
    – Limited capacities for regional support.
    – Poor programming and execution, in planning, implementation, resource levels and allocation, and knowledge management (including on baselines and monitoring).
  • Identified enabling factors that support successful performance and impact have included:
    – Broad consultations with national and regional actors (governments, international agencies, civil society), as well as national ownership.
    – Effective institutional arrangements, such as UNDP’s regional service centres, and effective policy arrangements (e.g. taking time to set up accountability structures).
    – Linkages between national and regional programmes.
    – Identifying the value-added of a regional approach and agencies’ comparative advantages.
    – Selecting the best funding modaliies, such as a blending of aid and loans for large projects.
file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID South Africa

Related Content

Aid and non-state armed groups
Helpdesk Report
2020
Non-State Policing in Fragile Contexts
Helpdesk Report
2019
The legitimacy of states and armed non-state actors
Topic Guide
2015
Non-state provision of skills development in South Asia
Helpdesk Report
2015
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023