GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»The Impact of Conflict on Women’s Voice and Participation

The Impact of Conflict on Women’s Voice and Participation

Helpdesk Report
  • Erika Fraser
May 2009

Question

Conflict has usually reduced the voice of the less powerful. This has generally included women. Is this effect universal?

Summary

Although conflict can reduce the voice of less powerful groups (including women), there are also opportunities for these groups to contest well-established social structures and divisions, and for new, non-traditional leaders to emerge.

Women assume varied roles during armed conflict, as victims, but also as perpetrators, as well as peace activists. There are sub-groups of women who may be particularly vulnerable as a result of conflict and are frequently invisible in post-conflict peace processes and community-driven development, for example: young women, female-headed households, widows, and women from marginalised groups. However, women are not necessarily the only, or even the most, excluded group in a given society. Furthermore, female participation does not necessarily lead to positive outcomes for women. Not all women have equal voices or the same vested interests; other issues of identity, such as ethnicity, religion, and age can be equally important.

Conflict can present new opportunities for women to assume different roles in society and get involved in decision-making. Women often secure important gains both within the family and local community and in broader political participation. However, women’s voices may temporarily retreat immediately after a conflict, as long-standing patterns of political representation and participation are re-established and men reassert their traditional positions of power. Once marginalised groups have been given a voice, however, it is unlikely that the gains achieved can simply be ‘rolled back’.

Although women leaders can be disproportionately targeted by illegal armed actors, it is also the case that the voices of marginalised groups, including women, can be amplified by support from international media, civil society organisations and UN agencies. A prolonged period of conflict can also lead to a public desire for a change in leadership and decision-making styles. There may be greater public support for women’s increased political participation, since they are often perceived to be more trustworthy, less violent and better at solving conflicts verbally than men.

 

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID Iraq

Related Content

Conditionality and other approaches to secure women’s rights provisions in peace processes
Helpdesk Report
2020
Effectiveness of Donor Support to Women in Formal Political Leadership-Narrative Review
Helpdesk Report
2019
Effectiveness of Aid Interventions to Strengthen Collective Action that Facilitate Women's Political Empowerment - Executive Summary
Helpdesk Report
2018
Effectiveness of Donor Support to Women in Formal Political Leadership - Executive Summary
Helpdesk Report
2018

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".