• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
  • Social Development
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»GSDRC Publications»The impact of protracted crises on attitudes and aspirations

The impact of protracted crises on attitudes and aspirations

Helpdesk Report
August 2016

Question

Describe the evidence on the impact of protracted crises on people’s attitudes and aspirations. Describe the scope of approaches and methods to understanding attitudes and aspirations in international development. Review the current initiatives to understand and respond to attitudes and aspirations in Uganda and Karamoja.

Summary

The review draws on both academic and grey literature, which reflects the variety of approaches to understanding attitudes and aspirations and how they are formed. Of particular importance are discussions of social norms, networks and capital and how these shape relations between individuals and groups and thus influence the formation and evolution of attitudes and aspirations. Despite the evidence for the importance of social norms, networks and capital, much of the existing qualitative and quantitative research on their role in crisis has focused on quick-onset events, such as natural disasters. Much less empirical research exists on precisely how social connections influence attitudes and aspirations in contexts of protracted crisis.

Key findings of this report include:

  • Conflict and crisis can transform existing economic or socio-cultural practices (e.g. on livelihoods, social norms, community power dynamics etc.), which can have a profound effect on attitudes and aspirations. ‘Cultural depression’ has been used to describe the major disruption to norms and values, including attitudes and aspirations, that crisis-affected people and societies face.
  • There is a need to move beyond the conflict and post-conflict frameworks that dominate analysis in the Karamoja region as new challenges emerge. More knowledge on the changing dynamics of Karamoja society, and people’s attitudes and aspirations on issues such as gender norms and violence, is required to inform future programming.

The report includes examples of approaches and methods for understanding attitudes and aspirations in international development from programmes in South Africa, the Great Lakes region, Zambia, Rwanda, Yemen and Syria.

Examples of initiatives to understand and explore attitudes and aspirations of the people in Karamoja include: a DFID-funded strategy review, a conflict assessment and a gender and conflict analysis toolkit test from Saferworld, analysis from Human Rights Watch and research about issues such as male youth engagement, urban migration, and the impact of armed conflict.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF - 337 KB]

Enquirer:

  • DFID East Africa Research Hub

Suggested citation

Avis, W. (2016). The impact of protracted crises on attitudes and aspirations (GSDRC Helpdesk Research Report 1,388). Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham.

Related Content

War Economy in North East Nigeria
Helpdesk Report
2020
Doing research in fragile contexts
Literature Review
2019
Conflict and gender dynamics in Yemen
Helpdesk Report
2017
Gender and conflict in the Western Balkans
Helpdesk Report
2017
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022