• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»The shadow economy in conflict-affected countries

The shadow economy in conflict-affected countries

Helpdesk Report
  • Brigitte Rohwerder
December 2013

Question

What approaches can be used to (i) Leverage the positive social function that shadow economies provide to conflict-affected populations and (ii) Incentivise war profiteers to join the legal economy in post conflict environments?

Summary

Approaches which can be used to leverage the positive social function that shadow economies provide to conflict-affected populations include:

  • Using humanitarian aid to complement people’s coping strategies (Goodhand, 2006).
  • Understanding the relationship between different aspects of the economy through stakeholder assessments can reduce the risk that interventions have detrimental impacts on people’s coping strategies (Ballentine and Nitzsche, 2005).
  • Strengthening state capacity to provide basic services, security, and employment to its citizens so they do not have to rely on predatory elements of the shadow economy (Ballentine and Nitzschke, 2005).
  • Providing alternative livelihood opportunities (Looney, 2006).

Approaches which have been detrimental to leveraging the positive social function that shadow economies provide to conflict-affected populations include:

  • Interventions which have not considered the context often result in negative consequences for conflict-affected populations (Pugh and Cooper, 2004).
  • Approaches which can be used to incentivise war profiteers to join the legal economy in post conflict environments include:

    • Raising the cost of involvement in the shadow economy through sanctions and control regimes, strengthening regulations and improving resource governance.
    • Creating the right conditions for investment through strengthening the state’s capacity to provide a secure and predictable environment (Goodhand, 2004).
    • Providing positive inducements and support to encourage profiteers to invest in legitimate business (Goodhand, 2004).
    • Providing alternative livelihood options (Malone and Nitzschke, 2005). Including through Demobilisation, Disarmament, and Reintegration (DDR) programs (Ballentine and Nitzschke, 2005).
    • Encouraging profiteers own incentives to join the legal economy (Guistozzi, 2007).
    • Taking a regional approach to ensure that the shadow economy does not shift elsewhere (TDRP, 2012).

    Approaches which have been detrimental to incentivising war profiteers to join the legal economy in post conflict environments include:

    • Lack of support for a strong effective state means profiteers have no incentive to join the legal economy (Goodhand, 2004).
file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • Australian Government (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade)

Related Content

War Economy in North East Nigeria
Helpdesk Report
2020
Impacts of Covid-19 on Inclusive Economic Growth in Middle-income Countries
Helpdesk Report
2020
Inclusive and Sustained Growth in Iraq
Helpdesk Report
2018
The Impact of Entrepreneurship Training Programmes
Helpdesk Report
2018
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more