GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»Vulnerable groups in Burma and access to services

Vulnerable groups in Burma and access to services

Helpdesk Report
  • Huma Haider
October 2011

Question

Who are the most vulnerable people in Burma? What barriers do they face in accessing services?

Summary

Key fndings: This report focuses on vulnerable groups in Burma and access to basic services. The first part of the report outlines groups considered to be vulnerable and marginalised. These include minority ethnic groups (such as the Chin, Kachin, Karen, Karenni, Mon, Rohingyas, Shan). In some cases, minorities’ ethnic identity is closely linked with a religion other than the majority Buddhism. Other vulnerable groups are internally displaced persons (IDPs); women and girls; and children generally. Intersectionality of these identities can exacerbate vulnerability. For example, minority ethnic groups often live in conflict zones or areas with government authorised development projects. They are thus more likely to suffer from internal displacement, which brings additional challenges and insecurities. Additionally, women and girls from ethnic minority groups may be specifically targeted by armed forces and become victims of sexual violence.

The second part of the report discusses barriers to accessing basic services, focusing on education and health care. While some of these barriers affect the entire population, ethnic minority groups, IDPs, women and children are often particularly affected.

Barriers to accessing both education and health care include: severe under-investment in such services by the government, affecting both quantity and quality; high costs of accessing such services; and difficulties associated with armed conflict and displacement. Additional obstacles to education include low teacher salaries and training, which undermine the quality of education and in some cases encourages corrupt behavior; and discrimination against ethnic minority groups in terms of language of education and curriculum content. Additional obstacles to health services, in particular reproductive services, include cultural taboos about talking about reproductive health.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • Australian Government

Related Content

Aid and non-state armed groups
Helpdesk Report
2020
Non-State Policing in Fragile Contexts
Helpdesk Report
2019
The legitimacy of states and armed non-state actors
Topic Guide
2015
Non-state provision of skills development in South Asia
Helpdesk Report
2015

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".