GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»Trust Funds to Pay Security Forces Salaries

Trust Funds to Pay Security Forces Salaries

Helpdesk Report
  • Huma Haider
October 2010

Question

What are lessons learnt from using trust funds to pay security force salaries? In particular: what research has been done on LOTFA (the Law and Order Trust Fund for Afghanistan)? What other lessons are known about using trust funds in other countries to pay police salaries?

Summary

While there is much literature on aid modalities, including MDTFs; and on police reform – there is little that discusses the use of trust funds to pay security forces salaries. This helpdesk research report focuses primarily on the Law and Order Trust Fund for Afghanistan (LOTFA), which is profiled most frequently in the literature that does address this area.

LOTFA was set up in 2002 as a multi-donor mechanism to facilitate police salary payments and support law enforcement authorities. The UNDP was asked to administer the trust fund and took on the payment verification role, which incorporated an oversight function in a very risky fiduciary situation. Pooled LOTFA funds were paid to the Ministry of Finance Treasury department on a reimbursement basis, which allowed for police salaries to be kept on budget from early on and for the Afghan government to include such recurrent costs in fiscal frameworks and planning. The Fund has five priority activities: payment of police salaries nationwide; procurement of non-lethal equipment, and covering other recurrent expenditure such as fuel and maintenance costs;rehabilitation of facilities; training; and Institutional development.

Component 1, paying police salaries, has largely been delivered. Pay packages are being delivered more punctually; and the rollout of the electronic payment system is a key reform within the Ministry of Interior that is being driven largely by the LOTFA funding and technical support. While numerous donors contribute to the fund, it is highly dependent on donations from the European Community (EC) and the United States.

Some key challenges and lessons of the LOTFA – and of trust funds to pay public servant salaries (including security forces), more generally – include:

  • short time frames and unpredictable funding
  • fiscal sustainability
  • accountability and monitoring
  • institutional reform
  • capacity development
  • cross-cutting and context analysis
  • sector integration
  • harmonisation.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID Stabilisation Unit

Related Content

Local financing for infrastructure in Zambia
Helpdesk Report
2017
Implementing Public Financial Management Reform
E-Learning
2017
Decentralisation of budgeting process
Literature Review
2017
Public procurement reform: assessing interventions aimed at improving transparency
Literature Review
2016

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".