GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»Public Financial Management and Frontline Service Delivery

Public Financial Management and Frontline Service Delivery

Helpdesk Report
  • Emma Broadbent
January 2010

Question

What are the key issues to consider when designing a PFM reform programme which targets effective frontline service delivery? Please also provide examples of successful PFM interventions which have improved frontline service delivery and lessons from cases when this has not worked and why.

Summary

A review of the literature suggests that in designing PFM reform programmes it is essential to consider the following:

  • PFM reforms must be understood as part of a more general public sector reform process.
  • PFM reforms should have poverty reduction as a central objective.
  • PFM reforms need to be designed at sector level in order to accommodate the needs, capacities and willingness of public sector workers in different areas of service provision.
  • PFM reforms and their effects on service delivery require rigorous monitoring and evaluation.
  • Donors must ensure coordination between programmes, approaches and funding mechanisms in order to streamline reform activities, avoid duplication and avoid increasing the chances of corruption within the public sector.
  • Civil society (including parliamentarians and audit institutions) have a crucial role to play in demanding, sustaining and promoting PFM reforms in order to enhance service delivery.

PFM reforms are seen as crucial for the success of government and donor efforts to reduce poverty through the provision of effective services such as health, water and education. However in practice the reform process has met a number of problems:

  • Capacity amongst staff often remains weak
  • A long-term perspective for reforms needs to be adopted
  • Coordination between the Ministry of Finance and other ministries/agencies is often weak
  • Whilst promoting openness and transparency of government finances, the reform process is often hindered by a lack of information.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID Uganda

Related Content

Local financing for infrastructure in Zambia
Helpdesk Report
2017
Implementing Public Financial Management Reform
E-Learning
2017
Decentralisation of budgeting process
Literature Review
2017
Public procurement reform: assessing interventions aimed at improving transparency
Literature Review
2016

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".