GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»Scaling plastic reuse models in LMICs

Scaling plastic reuse models in LMICs

Helpdesk Report
  • William Avis
July 2025

Question

What is the evidence base on what works in terms designing scalable refill on the go (e.g. in-store dispensing system) and return on the go (e.g. users return packaging at a store or drop off point) plastic reuse models? What has been
tested and shown not to work?

Summary

To read the full article Click Here

This Rapid Evidence Review  synthesizes the current evidence base on the design and scalability of “refill on the go” and “return on the go” plastic reuse models in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). With plastic pollution rising sharply, transitioning from single-use to reuse systems presents a significant opportunity to reduce waste and emissions. While such systems offer environmental and economic benefits—such as reduced material use, job creation, and lower life cycle emissions—scaling them remains challenging due to infrastructure constraints, inconsistent policy frameworks, and consumer behaviour dynamics. The review highlights key enablers for scaling, including reliable water and energy supplies, robust transport infrastructure, cultural acceptance, regulatory support, and product traceability. Case studies from countries such as Brazil, Indonesia, Kenya, and India illustrate diverse approaches, from corporate-led reuse initiatives to local community-driven solutions. However, most evidence stems from pilot programs with limited evaluation data. A coordinated, context-specific, and system-wide approach, underpinned by supportive policies and stakeholder collaboration, is essential to mainstream reusable packaging models across LMICs.

To read the full article Click Here

Enquirer:

  • FCDO

Suggested citation

Avis, W. (2025). Scaling plastic reuse models in LMICs. K4DD Rapid Evidence Review 214. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies. DOI 10.19088/K4DD.2025.021

Related Content

Role of Faith and Belief in Environmental Engagement and Action in MENA Region
Helpdesk Report
2021
Areas and Population Groups in Pakistan Most Exposed to Combined Effects of Climate Change, Food Insecurity and COVID-19
Helpdesk Report
2021
Trends in Conflict and Stability in the Indo-Pacific
Literature Review
2021
Donor Support for Climate Change Initiatives in the Middle East and North Africa
Helpdesk Report
2020

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".