GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»Engaging stakeholders in areas of cross-border infrastructure investment

Engaging stakeholders in areas of cross-border infrastructure investment

Helpdesk Report
September 2015

Question

What are the best practices to engage a range of stakeholders (such as non-host governments and civil society, including affected communities or governments downstream from the main project site) in porous or disputed border areas, where trans-boundary infrastructure investment occurs? Pay particular attention to the hydro-energy sector.

Summary

This rapid review of the literature identifies a number of best practices for engaging with a range of stakeholders in contexts where trans-boundary infrastructure investment occurs. It outlines general guidelines and best practices identified by internationally recognised bodies, and presents specific evidence from the sectors of water infrastructure and energy (e.g. dams/hydro).

Trans-boundary or cross-border infrastructure is understood to be that which connects two or more countries as well as national infrastructure that has a significant cross-border impact (Bhattacharya, 2010). In terms of infrastructure projects, stakeholders could be governments or communities including those directly or indirectly affected by the project. A challenge posed by trans-boundary infrastructure investment projects is how to develop mechanisms that promote the participation of a broad cross-section of interests in resource planning and management decisions.

Key findings of the report include:

  • Building relationships with a range of stakeholders should be an integral part of infrastructure projects and can contribute to building an understanding of the local context and minimising risks and maximising opportunities to create and protect value for the project and local communities.
  • There are number of best practice and how-to guides which codify lessons for stakeholder engagement in a number of sectors, settings and contexts, and these provide useful guidance on the prerequisites for good stakeholder engagement including the need to ground engagement in a thorough contextual analysis that is conducted early in the project, with adequate resources and in collaboration with a range of stakeholders.
  • Stakeholder engagement needs to be grounded in legislation that ensures that a set of minimum requirements are met, including participation, the release of information, time allocated for public comment, and how stakeholder input will be used.
  • Stakeholder engagement in hydro/electric infrastructure development is particularly challenging. This is accentuated in instances where investment may have trans-boundary impacts. The establishment of initiatives, committees and communities of practice that operate in a trans-boundary manner can help manage expectations, mitigate conflict and demonstrate the benefits of co-operative water resource development to its member states and affected communities.
file type icon See Full Report [PDF - 633 KB]

Enquirer:

  • Australian Government

Suggested citation

Avis, W. (2015). Engaging stakeholders in areas of cross-border infrastructure investment (GSDRC Helpdesk Research Report 1277). Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham.

Related Content

Scaling plastic reuse models in LMICs
Helpdesk Report
2023
Lessons From Interventions That Address Livelihoods and Cross-border Conflict Systems
Literature Review
2022
Donor Support for the Human Rights of LGBT+
Helpdesk Report
2021
Interventions to Address Discrimination against LGBTQi Persons
Helpdesk Report
2021

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".