GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»How have social protection systems contributed to social and economic development in China?

How have social protection systems contributed to social and economic development in China?

Helpdesk Report
  • Erika Fraser
November 2011

Question

  • When and why were social protection systems introduced in China

  • What was the level of development and structure of their economies at this time and what sort of social protection systems were introduced?

  • What is the evidence of the contribution of the social protection systems to national social and economic development?

Summary

After the formation of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, social protection systems were gradually introduced and now cover many contingencies, including old age, unemployment, healthcare, maternity and occupational injury. However, despite having a comprehensive system for its ‘legal’ urban population, China is only recently extending this system to the much larger rural population.

The system of social protection is in transition, as China attempts to address a rapidly transforming economy and society. Programmes are continually being developed, piloted and extended that aim to address social concerns, for example: increasing unemployment and the ‘informalisation’ of the urban economy; inequalities and income disparities; vulnerability of poor households to sudden shocks; providing social protection for rural-urban migrants without urban hukuo (household registration) status; and an aging population.

China’s social welfare policies are moving in a more equitable direction but as they are quite new, studies tend to report onnly a modest impact. Programmes include:

  • Minimum Living Standards (Guarantee) Scheme (MLSS/MLSGS, also known as dibao), providing cash subsidies to poor families
  • New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) – a mixed provision health insurance scheme
  • New Rural Old-Age Insurance programme – a pension programme for rural residents
  • Medical Financial Assistance programme (MFA) to help the rural poor cover medical expenditures.
  • file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

    Enquirer:

    • DFID Uganda

    Related Content

    Affirmative action around the world Insights from a new dataset (update)
    Working Papers
    2023
    Pathways to Increase Rural Women’s Agency Within Social Protection Programmes
    Helpdesk Report
    2023
    Workplace-based Learning and Youth Employment in Africa
    Literature Review
    2020
    Social protection
    Topic Guide
    2019

    University of Birmingham

    Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

    Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

    We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".