• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Lessons from DDR programmes

Lessons from DDR programmes

Helpdesk Report
  • Iffat Idris
June 2016

Question

What lessons can be learned from DDR programmes, in particular those implemented in Africa?

Summary

While the literature on DDR programmes, their evolution and DDR experiences in individual countries (notably in Africa), is considerable and broadly consistent, there is little on the long-term effectiveness of DDR interventions.

DDR programming has evolved significantly over the past few decades in response to changing situations and emerging challenges; from traditional DDR programmes implemented in post-conflict situations where a peace accord was in place and involved defined armed groups to second generation programmes, which have emerged to address less stable peace situations and engage communities, not just combatants. More flexible, ‘next generation’ DDR programmes, wider in scope and negotiated based on the local context, have also been identified. Despite this evolution, many challenges remain in designing and implementing DDR programmes.

Reviews of a number of DDR initiatives in Africa (Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region, Sudan, Somalia, and Central African Republic) confirm the issues identified in the literature review. Key lessons to emerge from the literature review include:

  • DDR initiatives should be nationally owned, with government, armed forces and civil society groups all playing a role. International partners can provide vital funding and technical support, since national capacity will typically be weak.
  • DDR programmes need reliable funding streams to ensure both timely and adequate funding. One option could be setting up a ‘DDR line’ within a relevant multi-donor trust fund.
  • DDR programmes should be based on careful assessment of the situation, to identify combatants, types and numbers of weapons, as well as areas of return and resettlement and reintegration opportunities and services.
  • Efforts should be made to ensure transparency in DDR programmes, particularly in eligibility criteria and decisions about exiting. Linked to transparency is the need for more effective monitoring and evaluation, particularly of outcomes: what happens to combatants when they exit DDR programmes, does violence recur?
  • DDR programmes typically target male ex-combatants, but there are many others who should be included (women, minors, the disabled) and will need programmes geared to their specific needs.
  • It is vital that DDR programmes, particularly in the reintegration phase, provide tangible benefits to host communities as well as to ex-combatants. This will aid the process of reconciliation and social reintegration of ex-combatants, as well as support sustainable peace and development.
  • In order to be effective and deliver sustained results, DDR programmes must be linked to wider reforms and strategies to promote national development, make the security sector efficient and accountable, and promote transitional justice.
  • DDR is a complex process involving many diverse actors. Integration and coordination between these is important, and should at minimum be strengthened between donor partners.
file type icon See Full Report [PDF - 395 KB]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Suggested citation

Idris, I. (2016). Lessons from DDR programmes (GSDRC Helpdesk Research Report 1368). Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham.

Related Content

Conflict
Topic Guide
2014
Costs of peace processes
Helpdesk Report
2014
The shadow economy in conflict-affected countries
Helpdesk Report
2013
Conflict and Stabilisation in Mali and the Sahel Region
Helpdesk Report
2013
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more