• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Water and Energy in Central Asia

Water and Energy in Central Asia

Helpdesk Report
  • Shivit Bakrania
May 2010

Question

What research has been published on the political economy of trans-boundary water and energy issues in Central Asia, including Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan?

Summary

Much of the literature on the political economy of trans-boundary water and energy in Central Asia covers common ground on the following issues:

  • Historical factors in the region and the legacy on water allocation of Soviet Rule – although there is some variation in opinion over the extent to which Soviet-era water and energy allocations have contributed to instability, conflict and environmental degradation.
  • The various mechanisms and institutions that exist to facilitate regional cooperation – There appears to be some consensus that national leaders only play lip service to regional agreements and that political-will is lacking. Much of the literature here also suggests that international actors should act in a manner that reinforces regional cooperation
  • Local and community level organisations, such as Water Users Organisations (WAU), which need to be involved and included in the formation of regional water and energy policy.
  • The potential for conflict in the region arising from disputes over different water and energy needs between upstream and downstream countries – There are a number of papers devoted to issues of water, conflict and security.
  • Although not strictly within the scope of this report, a number of papers highlight the potentially destabilising effects of development in Afghanistan on water allocations in Central Asia.

The literature suggests that the region is perceived to be strategically and geopolitically important by a number of external actors. The contemporary role of the US, Russia and China in region is briefly referred to in some of the articles presented here, but detailed analysis on their role, influence and impact was not found during the research period for this report.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Related Content

Regional cooperation and political stability and prosperity
Donor funded alliances promoting regional cooperation
Helpdesk Report
2017
Factors affecting success or failure of political transitions
Helpdesk Report
2017
National climate change governance
Topic Guide
2017
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more