GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»Harmful traditional practices in diaspora communities

Harmful traditional practices in diaspora communities

Helpdesk Report
  • Evie Browne
May 2014

Question

What is the evidence of the continuation or cessation of (or changes to) harmful traditional practices by diaspora communities contrary to trajectories of change in their countries of origin. Please include evidence on female genital mutilation/cutting and child, early and forced marriage.

Summary

In general, the trajectory of change among the diaspora communities discussed in the literature surveyed for this report is away from carrying out HTPs. There are fewer examples identified of communities wishing to uphold these practices in their new countries.

The literature identifies several factors which impact on change in attitudes and practices:

  • Legality: All host countries in this report have made HTPs illegal. Knowledge of the law, and fear of repercussions, have an impact on communities’ willingness to undertake HTPs.
  • Social pressures: Diaspora respondents often cited that being away from their extended families and home communities freed them from the pressure to perform HTPs.
  • Cultural integration: Assimilating new values and norms from the host society has a very strong impact on HTPs. Where the majority of people do not undertake a certain practice, this make the diaspora community less likely to do so.
  • Access to information: Awareness raising and education campaigns directed at people who practice FGM/C often has a considerable impact on the practice, when they learn about the harmful medical effects, the lack of a religious requirement, or the human rights aspect. There is less evidence on this for early marriage.
  • Diasporic identity: Members of the diaspora are influenced by home and host societies’ influences, and often struggle between respect for traditions and new opportunities. Second-generation children can use traditional practices for their own purposes, such as early marriage to escape parents’ control.

This report found some differing evidence among these factors. The diaspora communities discussed in the literature do not necessarily adopt the same views or behave uniformly in relation to HTPs, nor do all members of a particular community. There are various examples in the literature of people exercising individual agency against the mainstream. In addition, culture is not static and can change and adapt according to circumstances.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID Aids and Reproductive Health Team

Related Content

Rapid fragility and migration assessment for Somalia
Literature Review
2016
Rapid fragility and migration assessment for Ethiopia
Literature Review
2016
Radicalisation of diaspora communities
Helpdesk Report
2015
Key actors mapping: Somalia
Literature Review
2013

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".