GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Multi-Hazards
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»Exploring the utility of Artificial Intelligence (AI) research tools in knowledge for development and diplomacy

Exploring the utility of Artificial Intelligence (AI) research tools in knowledge for development and diplomacy

Working Papers
  • William Avis
July 2026

William Avis,* Kaitlin Ball, Katherine Cheeseman, James Georgalakis, Sian Herbert, Iffat Idris, Zenobia Ismail, Brian Lucas, Shreya Jose Maliakal, Jasmin Morris, Sithandiwe Mujuru, Evert-Jan Quak, Sarah Verhaeg, and Mahdi Zaidan.

Abstract: This study presents findings from a pilot study conducted under the Knowledge for
Development and Diplomacy (K4DD) programme, commissioned by the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO). The study evaluated the effectiveness, efficiency, and ethical implications of using artificial intelligence (AI) tools in producing rapid evidence synthesis products. Three categories of AI tools (generative AI chat, research assistants, and systematic review tools) were tested across nineteen K4DD outputs. While results reveal that AI tools offer promise, particularly in early-stage research, their current utility in responding to complex, multifaceted research queries remains limited. The study concludes with recommendations for researchers, programmes, and institutions to guide ethical, effective and appropriate AI integration.

Policy relevance: This study provides policymakers with an evidence‑based assessment of the
role of emerging AI research tools in the delivery of rapid evidence synthesis products for time‑sensitive development and diplomacy decisions. It offers practical insights to guide responsible adoption, risk management, and future integration of AI within evidence‑informed policy processes.

Keywords: artificial intelligence (AI), knowledge for development, rapid evidence review,
research tools, ethics, large language models

Authors: William Avis, University of Birmingham: w.r.avis@bham.ac.uk. Kaitlin Ball,
(independent). Katherine Cheeseman, Institute of Development Studies. James Georgalakis,
Institute of Development Studies. Sian Herbert, University of Birmingham. Iffat Idris, University
of Birmingham. Zenobia Ismail, University of Birmingham. Brian Lucas, University of
Birmingham. Shreya Jose Maliakal, Institute of Development Studies. Jasmin Morris, Institute
of Development Studies. Sithandiwe Mujuru, University of Birmingham. Evert-Jan Quak,
Institute of Development Studies. Sarah Verhaeg, University of Birmingham. Mahdi Zaidan,
Institute of Development Studies.

Acknowledgements: This research was funded by the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and
Development Office (FCDO) under the Knowledge for Development and Diplomacy programme
(K4DD).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48352/uobxgsdrc.0005

Download PDF

 

Related Content

Influence of Political Culture on Development Outcomes
Helpdesk Report
2023
Digital Infrastructure Interventions to Address Climate Adaptation and Mitigation Needs
Helpdesk Report
2023
Inclusive and Collectively Owned Development Co-operation: Reflections from the 2025 Busan Forum
Blog
2023
What Interventions Impact Migration in the Eastern Neighbourhood and Central Asia
Helpdesk Report
2023

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2026; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2026; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2026

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".