GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Research
    • Governance
      • Democracy & elections
      • Public sector management
      • Security & justice
      • Service delivery
      • State-society relations
      • Supporting economic development
    • Social Development
      • Gender
      • Inequalities & exclusion
      • Poverty & wellbeing
      • Social protection
    • Conflict
      • Conflict analysis
      • Conflict prevention
      • Conflict response
      • Conflict sensitivity
      • Impacts of conflict
      • Peacebuilding
    • Humanitarian Issues
      • Humanitarian financing
      • Humanitarian response
      • Recovery & reconstruction
      • Refugees/IDPs
      • Risk & resilience
    • Development Pressures
      • Climate change
      • Food security
      • Fragility
      • Migration & diaspora
      • Population growth
      • Urbanisation
    • Approaches
      • Complexity & systems thinking
      • Institutions & social norms
      • Theories of change
      • Results-based approaches
      • Rights-based approaches
      • Thinking & working politically
    • Aid Instruments
      • Budget support & SWAps
      • Capacity building
      • Civil society partnerships
      • Multilateral aid
      • Private sector partnerships
      • Technical assistance
    • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Indicators
      • Learning
      • M&E approaches
  • Services
    • Research Helpdesk
    • Professional development
  • News & commentary
  • Publication types
    • Helpdesk reports
    • Topic guides
    • Conflict analyses
    • Literature reviews
    • Professional development packs
    • Working Papers
    • Webinars
    • Covid-19 evidence summaries
  • About us
    • Staff profiles
    • International partnerships
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and conditions
    • Contact Us
Home»GSDRC Publications»Methodologies for Measuring the Value of Civil Society

Methodologies for Measuring the Value of Civil Society

Helpdesk Report
  • Zoe Scott
October 2009

Question

What different methodologies, including Social Return on Investment, have been used to calculate the value of civil society in developing countries? What measures have been used and how have they calculated costs and benefits?

Summary

The rise of social entrepreneurship and venture philanthropy has led to an explosion of interest in the area of measuring value and calculating the impact of non-profits and social organisations. There is enormous interest in generating and developing rigorous quantitative tools to assist in accurate measurement of impact and value and a significant number of organisations are currently working on these issues. In the 2 days available for this query response it has therefore not been possible to review all the available literature. The methodologies featured below do not represent a comprehensive list, but instead highlight the most popular / publicised methodologies that are currently being used in developing countries.

In many cases methodologies that have only been used in developed countries to date could plausibly be applied in a developing country context. Similarly, methodologies developed for profit-making companies could equally be used for non-profit making organisations. Most of the methodologies aim to calculate the value of civil society on an organisational or programme level, although the ‘UN Non Profit Handbook Project’ and ‘The Comparative Non Profit Sector Project’ consider how to measure and value the sector on a national and international scale.

A repeated theme in the literature below and in the feedback from experts is that this is an extremely complicated area and that there is currently no consensus on the best tools to use. Instead, all the methodologies have limitations and the debate as to how one can accurately value civil society organisations has only really just begun.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Related Content

After Kabul: Addressing concerns about corruption in donor publics by rechannelling aid
Working Papers
2023
Donor Support for Climate Change Initiatives in the Middle East and North Africa
Helpdesk Report
2020
The Development Impact of Chinese Development Investments in Africa
Literature Review
2020
Lessons for coherent and integrated conflict analysis from multilateral actors
Helpdesk Report
2020

University of Birmingham

Connect with us: Bluesky Linkedin X.com

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2025; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2025; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2025

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".