• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»GSDRC Publications»Options for managing a sudden rise in public debt

Options for managing a sudden rise in public debt

Helpdesk Report
  • Anna Orrnert
October 2019

Question

What options are there for managing a sudden rise in public debt, including examples of how this has successfully been tackled.

Summary

Debate has raged over whether and when debt reduction is appropriate, particularly in advanced economies. Arguments for lowering public debt are based on the costs and risks generated by high public debt; debt reduction is generally deemed appropriate when the risks associated with it are greater than those associated with debt-reducing policies (Best et al 2018: 2). The literature on public debt reduction can be grouped into three broad strands (i) studies that describe episodes of debt accumulation and its sources; (ii) studies that assess the economic implications of high debt (on economic growth and interest rates); and (iii) studies that focus on debt reduction episodes, fiscal adjustment and its impact on the economy (Baldacci et al 2012: 370). This review draws mainly from the third strand. Options for managing high public debt generally fall into three categories:
 Conventional options, including fiscal consolidation, growth promoting policies (Best et al 2018); and the privatisation of government assets (Reinhart et al 2015)
 Unconventional options, including monetary policy (taxing wealth, inflation) and financial repression (Best et al 2018; Reinhart et al 2015)
 Radical options, such as outright default and debt restructuring (Best et al 2018; Reinhart et al 2015) This report focuses on the first two categories. The more radical approaches to dealing with high public debt are considered out-of-scope for this particular research question

file type icon See Full Report [300 KB]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Suggested citation

Orrnert, A. (2019). Options for managing a sudden rise in public debt. K4D Helpdesk Report 645. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies

Related Content

Lessons for coherent and integrated conflict analysis from multilateral actors
Helpdesk Report
2020
Donor funded alliances promoting regional cooperation
Helpdesk Report
2017
International development, UK aid and Official Development Assistance spending
Helpdesk Report
2017
Impact of economic sanctions on poverty and economic growth
Helpdesk Report
2017
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2023; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2023; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2023