• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Learning
  • E-Bulletin

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
    • Supporting economic development
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Poverty & wellbeing
    • Social protection
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Rights-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • M&E approaches
    • Indicators
    • Learning
Home»GSDRC Publications»Political Economy of Civil Service Reform

Political Economy of Civil Service Reform

Helpdesk Report
  • Zoe Scott
December 2009

Question

Please provide recent literature on the political economy of civil service reform, with a particular focus on how civil service reform is subject to political considerations, ethnic and regional factors, and the power and interests of bureaucrats and politicians. Please include empirical examples from Asia, Africa and Latin America.

Summary

Much of the recent literature on civil service reform (CSR) emphasises that reforms have tended to fail and that political factors are critical to the success or failure or reform efforts. Political contextual factors and the impact of bureaucrats’ and politicians’ personal interests are most frequently discussed. Regional and ethnic political factors were generally not explored in detail. Several points emerge as themes from the literature included in this report:

  • Strong, committed political leadership is critical to CSR success.
  • Civil servants are embedded in society and are therefore entrenched in societal norms. There is broad consensus that reforms must take account of institutional context.
  • An analysis of incentives should be part of CSR programmes in order to increase the chances of reforms being adopted and embedded. These incentives do not always have to be financial.
  • There has been experience of ‘soft’ reforms that focus on facilitating personal attitudinal and cultural change amongst bureaucrats.
  • CSR programmes should consider ways of building the public legitimacy of reforms.
  • CSR in developing countries often happens in a wider context of public scepticism and apathy. Several articles explore the role of civil society as a political actor in public administrative reform.
  • Donors and reformers need diagnostic tools to assist in the design of politically sensitive reforms.

There is very little evidence and research on donor engagement with the politics of CSR. The World Bank evaluations listed in this report emphasise that the Bank has not consistently or adequately engaged in political issues surrounding CSR, and emphasise the need for supporting diagnostic tools. Bangladesh and Bolivia are noted as the exceptions, but no further details are given (see page 29, Evans 2008). The Evans and Wilder 2006 paper is part of a wider World Bank / DFID review on tactics and strategies in CSR reform. Finally, the Jacobs 2009 paper reviews a DFID funded programme in Bangladesh which attempted to influence the motivations and mindsets of senior level bureaucrats to make them more ‘reform-minded’.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID

Related Content

Institutional partnerships and twinning between civil service organisations
Helpdesk Report
2017
Factors important to the establishment, renewal or rehabilitation of the civil service
Literature Review
2017
Public service reform
E-Learning
2015
Prioritising and sequencing public sector reform
Helpdesk Report
2014
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2021; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2021; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2021

We use cookies to remember settings and choices, and to count visitor numbers and usage trends. These cookies do not identify you personally. By using this site you indicate agreement with the use of cookies. For details, click "read more" and see "use of cookies".OkRead more