• About us
  • GSDRC Publications
  • Research Helpdesk
  • E-Bulletin
  • Privacy policy

GSDRC

Governance, social development, conflict and humanitarian knowledge services

  • Governance
    • Democracy & elections
    • Public sector management
    • Security & justice
    • Service delivery
    • State-society relations
  • Social Development
    • Gender
    • Inequalities & exclusion
    • Social protection
    • Poverty & wellbeing
  • Humanitarian Issues
    • Humanitarian financing
    • Humanitarian response
    • Recovery & reconstruction
    • Refugees/IDPs
    • Risk & resilience
  • Conflict
    • Conflict analysis
    • Conflict prevention
    • Conflict response
    • Conflict sensitivity
    • Impacts of conflict
    • Peacebuilding
  • Development Pressures
    • Climate change
    • Food security
    • Fragility
    • Migration & diaspora
    • Population growth
    • Urbanisation
  • Approaches
    • Complexity & systems thinking
    • Institutions & social norms
    • PEA / Thinking & working politically
    • Results-based approaches
    • Theories of change
  • Aid Instruments
    • Budget support & SWAps
    • Capacity building
    • Civil society partnerships
    • Multilateral aid
    • Private sector partnerships
    • Technical assistance
  • M&E
    • Indicators
    • Learning
    • M&E approaches
Home»GSDRC Publications»Staff Retention in African Public Service

Staff Retention in African Public Service

Helpdesk Report
  • Andrew McDevitt
November 2010

Question

Please identify lessons learned and experiences in supporting and funding staff retention in the public service in Africa, with a focus on Supreme Audit Institutions / Auditor General's Offices.

Summary

This helpdesk report identifies lessons learned on retaining staff in the public service in Africa, with a focus on external auditing (Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) and Offices of the Auditor General (OAG)). However, because documented experience from these institutions is scarce, it also includes literature on internal auditing in public bodies as well as experience from the wider public service. In addition, the final section of the report presents some emerging guidance on staff retention in SAIs, mainly from the International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI, notably:

  • Where recruitment and reward of staff is outside the SAI’s control, it needs to work with other stakeholders to persuade the Ministry of Finance of the benefits of it achieving greater control over its human resources.
  • Flexibility to set pay and remuneration for staff internally is crucial for SAIs.
  • SAIs should consider their work environment and conditions, to ensure that staff are motivated and feel able to fulfil their potential.
  • SAIs should consider what targets and good performance criteria they might set to encourage effective working.
  • Increasingly, SAIs are broadening the competition for promotions. Good practice includes the use of assessment tests and panels, particularly for managerial positions.
  • Career development arrangements are crucial for staff retention.
  • Monitoring levels and trends in staff turnover and establishing the reasons why staff leave through e.g. exit interviews can help improve retention in future.

file type icon See Full Report [PDF]

Enquirer:

  • DFID Rwanda

Related Content

Institutional partnerships and twinning between civil service organisations
Helpdesk Report
2017
Local financing for infrastructure in Zambia
Helpdesk Report
2017
Implementing Public Financial Management Reform
E-Learning
2017
Decentralisation of budgeting process
Literature Review
2017
birminghamids hcri

gro.crdsg@seiriuqne Feedback Disclaimer

Outputs supported by FCDO are © Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022
Connect with us: facebooktwitter

Outputs supported by DFID are © DFID Crown Copyright 2022; outputs supported by the Australian Government are © Australian Government 2022; and outputs supported by the European Commission are © European Union 2022